Collateral Damage USA: Extremist cells target 350,000 US civilians
Hundreds of thousands of Americans could be suffering direct effects of a well-hidden form of terrorism sweeping America involving interconnected extremist cells keeping targets under covert surveillance and assaulting them with psychological warfare tactics and military grade directed energy weapons’ (DEWs) invisible ammunition. New FOI documents reveal that the number of Americans targeted by such cells in the campaign of terror could exceed 350,000.
The state-sponsored terror program is a likely arm of the Bush/Obama ‘locate and assassinate’ New Phoenix Program in the petrochemical-military-industrial-complex (PMIC) ‘war on terror’ in which anyone not “with” government lies and deceit is a “terrorist.” In other words, the program is genocide of good, honest people. (See: Dupe, D. Let’s kill all the good people, August 29, 2010) This atrocity could be another WikiLeaks’ Modified Limited Hangout distraction from an even greater crime: Collateral Damage U.S.A.
That government is unleashing terror on America’s “greatest people,” that secret weapons with invisible force and fascist techniques refined since Nazi Germany days are ruining lives of innocent U.S. civilians should come as no surprise. G.W. Bush told the world that the U.S. would apply such wrath on anyone not “with” the PMIC agenda. Seen and heard throughout the world on September 11, 2001, Bush declared via satellite tv the evil plan for Targeted Individuals, precisely what they suffer daily:
“We will direct every resource at our disposal… every tool of intelligence, every instrument of law enforcement, every financial influence, and every necessary weapon of war to the disruption and eventual defeat of terrorism… Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists… Americans should expect a battle unlike any other they have ever seen, not one battle, but a lengthy campaign, some visible, others secret. We will drive terrorists from place to place until there is no refuge or rest.” (1)
Extrapolating from Bill Taylor, LPI Targeted Individual cases known to be RFID implanted, one-tenth of extremists’ targets have been secretly, forcibly implanted for easier tracking and assaulting with DEWs. (2)
In February, in reporting on the scheduled Directed Energy Professional Society national symposium, some of which was held behind closed doors, the writer highlighted in the article Directed Energy Weapons aimed at American targets: Learning opportunity:
“The Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS) fosters research and development in directed energy (DE), including high energy laser (HEL) and high power microwave (HPM) technologies, for national defense and civilian applications through professional communication and education.” (DEPS website – emphasis added)
Aside from being the best hidden weapons, the Navy Times reports that DEWs are the “most feared and controversial weapon of modern age.” Common bio-effects of electromagnetic and other non-lethal weapons include effects to the human central nervous system resulting in physical pain, difficulty breathing, vertigo, nausea, disorientation and other systemic discomfort. Weapons not considered “lethal” can cause cumulative damage to the human body including death through “slow-kill.”
Microwave pulses can affect not only the epidermis (skin), but also the dermis, the thick sensitive layer of skin and connective tissue beneath the epidermis that contains blood, lymph vessels, sweat glands, and nerve endings, generating a burn or inducing terminal disease from as far as 700 yards or more if applied by satellite.
Since the new weapons’ ammunition penetrates buildings to injure targets, they leave no evidence of the perpetrator, a perfect crime weapon. The heart attack gun and the ray gun are only a couple of many in the arsenal of military high-tech weapons now passed on to the Department of Justice that can be used to assassinate American civilians exposing too much truth. American Targeted Individuals claim being injured, in some cases tortured and in some cases tortured to death with the new weaponry.
Domestic surveillance, extreme stalking psychological warfare on civilians
New Freedom of Information documents reveal that the DOJ published statistics in a report, Stalking Victimization in the United States in 2009 included a survey that misled the American public by omitting extreme stalking material facts.(3)
“Extreme stalking” involves organized domestic terror cells stalking targets. It is also known as “gang-stalking,” “cause stalking,” or “organized stalking.”
Stalking experts agree that stalking is terror. For example, among first words to describe stalking, Crime Victim Services states, “Stalking is a form of terror that 5-20% of women in the US experience.”
Targeted Individuals consistently report ongoing, frequent, extreme stalking tactics: professional unforced house break-ins, illegal searches, thefts, pet killings, gas-lighting (such as moving personal property when the subject is away or asleep), use of weapons; and use of a variety of tactics. These are the same tactics that Psychiatrist stalking specialists, Doctors Emmelkamp and Kamphius, identify as “extreme stalking” and as indicators of future physical violence and lethality.(4)
“Somewhat more extreme [stalking] forms include ordering goods and services in the victim’s name and charging to the victim’s account, placing false advertisements or announcements, ordering funeral wreaths, spreading rumours about the victim, starting numerous frivolous law suits, smearing the victim’s home or destroying or moving their property, threatening the victim with violence, or actually attacking them. Stalkers sometimes involve third parties, which leads to victimisation by association of their family, friends, colleagues, lawyers, psychiatrists or psychologists, etc. (Emmelkamp and Kamphius)
Five hallmarks of extremist cell targeting include:
1. High frequency of attacks and long-term duration of attacks
2. Use of a variety of tactics
3. Professional unforced house entry, with no sign of force regardless of types of locks, often to access targets while asleep.
4. Law enforcement refusal to protect targets, investigate, or prosecute
5. Covering-up the crime with torture tactics created to appear so unbelievable that bogus “mental illness” is used to discredit targets, or so well-disguised that the induced “mysterious illnesses” neutralize targets
Extremist stalking cells stalking prey
FOIA request No. 10-00169 to DOJ Office of Justice Programs via a letter dated March 22, 2010 reveal that 446,790 stalking incidents are committed by three or more people, almost half involving offenders working together, a new form of organized crime. (5)
Of the 446,790 episodes of stalking committed by 3 or more persons, 4 in 10 were committed by the offenders working together.
Did All These People Act as a Team or a Group? In the total 3 or more offenders of the 446,790 100, 185,050 41.2 answers were “Yes,” and 230,080 51.5 answers were “No,” 26,550 5.9 were “Don’t know and
6,110 1.4 were “Missing.”
Significant numbers of group stalkers were reported in groups of between 3 and up to 50 stalkers working as part of a “team or group,” in the tens of thousands.
“The study shows at least 185,050 group or cell stalking victims exist in the U.S. “This number is artificially low,” however, “due to two confounding variables in the study” states the Now Public report:
1. The 5.9 percent reporting not knowing whether a team or group was involved contains an unknown number of group stalking victims. Assuming it is the same as the 41.2 percent for victims knowing three or more stalkers are working in teams or groups, the number of victims exceeds 200,000.
2. The 2,262,940 “harassment victims” were excluded from the study if they did not state they feared for their safety, or, the safety of a family member.(3) This means that if the excluded harassment group follows a similar pattern of harassment as those deemed “stalking victims, the number of U.S. citizens being gang stalked exceeds 350,000.”
“Stalkingis typically defined as the willful, malicious, and repeated following or harassing of another person that threatens hisor her safety.” (Meloy & Gothard, 1995, p. 258).
Based on the 350,000 number, 35,000 Targeted Individuals could be implanted unwillingly and unknowingly. As Taylor commented, some sources day all of them are implanted.
Based on the 2009 DOJ report, Katrina Baum, Ph.D., Shannan Catalano, Ph.D., Michael Rand, Kristina Rose found that:
- About half (46%) of stalking victims experienced at least one unwanted contact per week, and 11% of victims said they had been stalked 5 years or more.
- Approximately 1 in 4 stalking victims reported some form of cyberstalking such as e-mail (83%) or instant messaging (35%).
- Women were at greater risk than men for stalking victimization; however, women and men were equally likely to experience harassment victimization.(6)
Who works in the cells?
In his book, Cause Stalking, David Lawson describes his 12 years of infiltrating extremist cells and quotes stalking cell recruits:
“‘We are like the police except we are ABOVE the police.’
‘We are a citizen’s group that helps the police. We are trying to alert people in the area about this person [the target] before he gets to do what he did in the last place he lived.’
‘When I get the call, I go to whatever the address is. It doesn’t matter what they [targets] do, they can never get away from us.’
‘Who are we? We drive the ambulances that take you to the emergency room. When your house is burning, we put out the fire. We are security guards. We protect you at night. YOU ONLY HAVE ELECTRICITY, PHONE AND CABLE SERVICE BECAUSE OF US. We are janitors. We have the keys. We fix your cars. YOU DON’T WANT TO MESS WITH US.’”
Most stalking victims do not recognize that they are under surveillance until the intrusions have occurred over a long period or become overtly threatening or violent.
Most families and friends of targets do not recognize that a target is under surveillance and DEW assaults until it is too late.
1. O’Connor. T. The Criminology Of Terrorism: History, Law, Definitions, Typologies, Syllabus for JUS 429. Austin Peay State University. MegaLinks in Criminal Justice
4. J. H. Kamphius, PhD and P.M.G. Emmelkamp, PhD, Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Stalking — a contemporary challenge for forensic and clinical psychiatry, The British Journal of Psychiatry, 2000, 176: 206-209 online: http://bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/full/176/3/206
5. DOJ, Stalking Victimization in the United States, page 10, D.O.J. Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, January, 2009
Copyright © 2010 Deborah Dupré. All rights reserved. This article cannot be copied, posted, emailed, or republished without author permission.
The author grants permission to copy this article title and first paragraph only – linked to this Examiner page.
Deborah Dupré, with post-graduate science and education degrees from U.S. and Australian universities, has been a human and environmental rights advocate for over 25 years in the U.S., Vanuatu and Australia. Support her work by subscribing to her articles and forwarding the link of this article to friends and colleagues or reposting only the title and first paragraph linked to this Examiner page. Dupre welcomes emails: info@DeborahDupre.com See her Vaccine Liberty or Death book plus Compassion Film Project DVDs.