Picasa Web Albums – Elyssa D’ Educrat

NOTICE THE WATERMARK IN THE LOWER RIGHT CORNER! IT SAYS login:

THE ID THAT WAS POSTED ALL OVER THE INTERWEBS HAS WATERMARK TOO… JADED NOT ONLY LIFTED DOCUMENTS FROM PRIVATE FOLDERS, HE HAD THE BALLS TO PUT THE ALTERED DOCUMENTS BACK IN TO NEW FOLDER THAT HE MADE ON JUNE 11, 2011 AKA #FuckFBIFriday #anitsec #Lulz

color me crazy… but at least I can tell the difference between a PsyOp and psychopathic nerd who is working with the Pentagon creating fake identities and false flag terror operations.

well guess what.. be afraid. be very, very afraid!

ed70 over and OUT

BART mobile shutdown provokes Anonymous hackers

Hackers have targeted the website of a San Francisco transport company that turned off mobile masts to prevent protests outside its stations.

Public anger towards the Bay Area Rapid Transport (BART) had been fermenting since July when transit police shot dead a man who was carrying a knife.

BART disconnected its transmitters in a bid to quell planned demonstrations.

Hacker group Anonymous retaliated by attacking myBART.org, and releasing users’ personal information.

The hackers posted details of over 2,000 myBART users online.

A man uses his iPhone at Civic Centre Station, San FranciscoMobile users on the BART network were completely cut off while protests were allegedly being organised

In a typically-worded statement, the hacking group said: “We are Anonymous, we are your citizens, we are the people, we do not tolerate oppression from any government agency.

“BART has proved multiple times that they have no problem exploiting and abusing the people.”

BART’s main website, BART.gov, was left unaffected.

However, myBART.org – which carries offers and extra services for passengers – was defaced and, as of Monday, remained offline.

‘Disruptive activities’

An action group has called for the disbanding of the BART police force following the July 3 shooting of a homeless man Charles Hill and also the 2009 killing of another man, Oscar Grant.

Johannes MehserleJohannes Mehserle was convicted of involuntary manslaughter over the death of Oscar Grant

Protesters have already been successful in rendering some stations on the network unusable by staging mass sit-ins.

BART took the decision, on 11 August, to shut off mobile phone reception at some of its sites.

In a statement, the transport company said: “BART temporarily interrupted service at select BART stations as one of many tactics to ensure the safety of everyone on the platform.”

It said protesters had stated that they: “would use mobile devices to coordinate their disruptive activities and communicate about the location and number of BART Police”.

BART added: “Disturbance during commute times at busy downtown San Francisco stations could lead to platform overcrowding and unsafe conditions for BART customers, employees and demonstrators.”

UK troubles

The move was widely criticised as being heavy-handed, with some San Francisco residents suggesting that blocking phone use was a violation of free speech.

BART’s decision has parallels with recent troubles in England where days of riots were sparked when 29-year-old Mark Duggan was shot dead by police in Tottenham, north London.

Prime Minister David Cameron suggested in Parliament that access to social networks could be blocked in times of civil unrest.

David Cameron outlines ideas for social media measures during rioting

His comments came after it emerged some of the looting and violence was co-ordinated by people using services such as Blackberry messenger.

His statement was widely condemned by rights campaigners who said that such measures could be an attack on civil liberties.

On Monday, BART warned of further disruption to the service, and did not rule out that similar blocking-measures could be used.

‘Completely unjustified’

However, reaction to Anonymous’ intrusions has been less than supportive.

Laura Eichman, whose phone number was published along with the stolen personal data, said: “I think what they [the hackers] did was illegal and wrong.

“I work in IT myself, and I think that this was not ethical hacking. I think this was completely unjustified.”

Anonymous has argued that anger should be directed at BART’s “unsecure” data protection methods, rather than the group.

DING!

Study finds third of teachers have been bullied online

Study finds third of teachers have been bullied online

Pupil putting up hand in classroomOver a quarter of the abuse comes from parents, the survey found

Related Stories

More than a third of teachers have been subject to online abuse, according to a survey conducted by Plymouth University.

The majority of the abuse – 72% – came via pupils but over a quarter was initiated by parents.

The majority of teachers claiming online abuse were women.

Much of the abuse is via chat on social networks but the study also found that many were setting up Facebook groups specifically to abuse teachers.

In some cases, people posted videos of teachers in action on YouTube while others put abusive comments on ratemyteacher.com.

In total, 35% of teachers questioned said they had been the victim of some form of online abuse. Of these, 60% were women.

Perhaps surprisingly, 26% of the abuse came from parents.

“This parental abuse is something we haven’t come across before,” said Prof Andy Phippen, the author of the report.

“Sometimes they are abusing other children at the school as well. Schools need to clamp down on it, or it will increase in prevalence,” he warned.

Human costs

The cases of children suffering online bullying have been well-documented but the issue of teachers being abused is less well-known.

But it is a growing problem. The National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT) said that it receives calls every week from teachers who believe they have been cyberbullied.

The study took testimony from more than 300 professionals in an anonymous internet-based survey and followed up with a handful of in-depth interviews.

Many of these revealed the human cost such cyberbullying was having.

One teacher said: “I eventually had a breakdown in the summer holiday needing an emergency doctor to be called out – as I had become suicidal.

“I had intensive support from the mental health unit via my GP, a new telephone guidance service that really helped me plus medication which was a great help, and still is.”

The guidance service referred to is the Professional Online Safety Helpline, a new initiative from the Safer Internet Centre.

In another testimony, a teacher was falsely accused of “inappropriate behaviour” towards a pupil.

New route

“I was questioned by the police on one single occasion and released without charge, caution or reprimand… I also ended up in the care of a psychologist to help me deal with the loss of self-worth, depression and the urge to commit suicide,” the teacher said.

For Prof Phippen the phenomenon illustrates a shift in how parents and children address issues at school.

“It seems to a subset of the population the teacher is no longer viewed as someone who should be supported in developing their child’s education, but a person whom it is acceptable to abuse if they dislike what is happening in the classroom,” said Prof Phippen.

“Clearly some people are viewing social media as a bypass to the traditional routes (head teacher, board of governors) of discussing dissatisfaction with the school,” he added.

Facebook offers tips for teachers and promises to respond to reports of individual harassment within 24 hours.

“These online discussions are a reflection of those happening offline,” said a Facebook spokesman.

“But while you can’t report a conversation outside the school gates or easily stop a person sending abusive, anonymous emails, Facebook have worked hard to develop reporting mechanisms that enable people to report offensive content they are concerned about.”

DING!

England riots: What’s the meaning of the words behind the chaos?

England riots: What’s the meaning of the words behind the chaos?

Confrontation between police and rioters in Hackney

From shot 29-year-old Mark Duggan referring to the police as “feds” to the nuanced use of the word “community”, the language of the riots and the response can tell us something.

It may have been England that was shaken by violence, looting and disorder.

But many of the terms used by its perpetrators came from a very different place altogether – and, due to coverage of the rioting, they have found a wider audience than ever before.

“If you see a fed… SHOOT!” read one message circulated on BlackBerry Messenger, imploring readers to riot.

Another, widely reported in the aftermath of the chaos, urged everyone to “up and roll to Tottenham [expletive] the 5-0”. There were myriad references as well to the “po po”.

Mark Duggan, whose fatal shooting by police sparked the violence, himself sent a text message shortly before his death which read: “The feds are following me.”

Slang for the police

  • Slang terms for the police, often hostile and originated by criminals, go back a long time
  • “Pig” was first used to mean police officer in 1811, the OED says
  • “Peeler” was in use to refer to Irish constables by 1817 and was widely used for Robert Peel’s prototype force in 1829
  • The “fuzz” is first recorded in the US in 1929

All these terms used to express antipathy towards the police share a common feature – all are derived from the inner cities of the US, not of the UK.

To outsiders, it appeared incongruous that these terms were commonly used by youngsters who were straight out of comprehensive, not Compton.

But when politicians and pundits used such terms to argue that the pernicious influence of hip hop and rap was responsible for fuelling the riots, they themselves ended up using vernacular gleaned from their box sets of The Wire.

When Michael Gove, the education secretary, discussed the possible causes of the disorder, he attacked the instant gratification of “gangsta” culture. Reporters transcribed the word as it might appear on the lyric sheet of a Dr Dre CD, instead of “gangster”, as once would have been expected when deployed by an Aberdonian Tory MP who represents a constituency in Surrey.

However, Jennifer Blake, a youth worker who runs the Safe and Sound anti-gang project in Peckham, south London, says such commentators miss the point.

Scene from the first series of The WireThe Wire included terms “po-po” and “5-0”

“When kids talk about the feds, it’s obvious that they’re not talking about the FBI,” she says. “They know that’s not how things work over here. It’s like a code – politicians and the media don’t understand.”

She highlights home-grown phrases like “bully van”, meaning police van, and “shank”, meaning knife, as evidence that UK street culture is not just passively replicating the language of the US inner cities.

Indeed, Jonathon Green, author of the Chambers Slang Dictionary, points out that many of the messages which circulated during the riots included non-US phrases.

These included exhortations to defend one’s “yard” – used in its Jamaican-derived sense, meaning home – or one’s “end”, a home-grown term referring to an area of a city.

Exclusive blend

All, he says, are examples of Multicultural London English (MLE), a dialect identified among young people in the capital which blends the phonetics and vocabulary of such diverse influences as West Indian, south Asian and traditional cockney.

He says the use of “feds” to mean the UK constabulary dates back no further than 1997, and the English deployment of “po po” – which originated in Los Angeles during the 1980s – is even more recent. Such Americanisms, Green says, have to be understood in this context, at least within London where the riots began.

The SopranosThe Sopranos series regularly used the term “feds”

“It’s an ironical use,” he says. “Obviously there’s been an increased Americanisation of our language since the war, but MLE doesn’t just come from one source. It just so happens that rap music has lots of terms for the police.”

Of course, the language of hip hop and rap has been adopted far more widely than just among the inner city black youths who form its target audience.

Professor Gus John of the Institute of Education, University of London, has long worked with young people associated with gangs and has studied changes in language within England’s multi-ethnic communities. He argues that such terminology has the function of setting its users apart from the mainstream.

“It has its own resonance. It’s also exclusive, it becomes an internal language to people who share particular lifestyles. That’s part of its potency.

“The fact that it is internal, the fact it is not commonly used by everybody, helps to define the group.”

Woman cleaning the streets of BatterseaOpponents of the rioters have their own terminology

Certainly, those who know little of hip hop culture, and would themselves reject violence and rioting, might have their own nicknames for the police, such as Old Bill or Peelers.

And among those attempting to speak for the majority appalled by the disorder, one word was regularly repeated.

Tottenham’s MP David Lammy spoke of “a mood of anxiety in the local community”. Sikhs who gathered in west London to guard against looters said they were “here to defend our temple and our community”. Richard Mannington Bowes, who died trying to prevent looting, was quickly hailed as a “hero of the community”.

The “community”, it appeared, was everything and everyone that did not include the rioters.

Indeed, the focus on “gangsta” terminology tells us just as much about the media as it does about the perpetrators of disorder, suggests lexicographer Susie Dent.

“I think journalists have adopted it because it distils the mood and the type of person perceived to be behind the past few days, and also because there’s been a distinct uncertainty, almost nervousness, about what to call the perpetrators,” she says.

“Are they rioters, which implies a political objection, looters, which doesn’t, or vandals, etc? It’s interesting too that a lot of the people cleaning up embraced the Sun’s ‘scum’ so readily, a reflexive response of anger.”

Whether it comes from the criminals themselves or the law-abiding majority, the words used to describe England’s riots tells us much about the society that produced them.

What is becoming increasingly clear is that far more than language divides the two sides.

Court: Cyberbullying Threats Are Not Protected Speech

748443511_e3b89339d2

A California appeals court ruled this week that threatening posts made by readers of a website are not protected free speech, allowing a case charging the posters with hate crimes and defamation to proceed.

The case raises fundamental questions about cyberbullying and the line between online speech and hate crimes.

In her dissenting opinion, Judge Frances Rothschild said the appellate court ruling “alters the legal landscape to the severe detriment of First Amendment rights.”

The case involves a teen identified as “D.C.” in court documents, who launched a website in 2005 when he was 15 to promote his pursuit of an acting and singing career. According to court documents, the student has recorded an album and played a leading role (.pdf) in an unnamed feature film, using the pseudonym “Danny Alexander.”

Fellow students at his private high school, Harvard-Westlake School in Los Angeles, posted derogatory comments on his site, mocking his perceived sexual orientation and making hostile statements that threatened him with bodily harm, such as “Faggot, I’m going to kill you,” and “I want to rip out your fucking heart and feed it to you.”

The site was taken down, and the boy’s father contacted school authorities and the local police, who advised the family to withdraw their son from the school until an investigation could be conducted. The family did so and, after the investigation dragged on for a while, moved to Northern California.

The police ultimately determined that the postings did not meet the criteria for criminal prosecution and were protected speech.

The father then sued six students and their parents accusing them of hate crimes, defamation — for falsely calling his son a homosexual — and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The school’s board of directors and three employees were also sued.

One of the defendant students and his parents filed a motion to strike under the state’s anti-slapp law, saying the posts were jocular in nature, intended as a joke and that the statement the student posted was protected speech. The student had written, among other things, “I’ve wanted to kill you. If I ever see you I’m … going to pound your head in with an ice pick.”

A judge rejected the motion in 2008. That’s when the case went to the appellate court, which upheld the lower court’s decision, saying in part that the case didn’t fall under the anti-slapp-suit law and that the defendants “did not demonstrate that the posted message is free speech.” Judges Robert Mallano and Jeffrey Johnson, writing for the majority, said the messages revealed a harmful intent and were not protected speech.

The student-defendant stated in court documents that he was directed to the “Danny Alexander” site by another student and was “offended and put off by its ‘I am better than you’ attitude and its blatant bragging and self promotion.”

“I had spent time in the past studying Buddhism,” the defendant stated, “and in light of the Buddhist tradition of quiet understatement, the website’s distinctively narcissistic tone was disturbing.”

So he posted a message threatening to kill “Danny Alexander” with an ice pick.

The defendant says he was inspired by the derogatory comments of other posters and wanted to “one-up” them.

“I was in a playful mood and decided to add my own message to the internet graffiti contest that was apparently going on,” he said. “My message is fanciful, hyperbolic, jocular and taunting and was motivated by [the plaintiff’s] pompous, self aggrandizing, and narcissistic website — not his sexual orientation.”

The student says he later sent a letter of apology to the plaintiff and his family regretting his “infantile, immature” conduct. His father also grounded him and canceled his internet account.

In their ruling, the majority judges write that the message the student posted to the site was “unequivocal” and “a serious expression of intent to inflict bodily harm.”

“That these words produce grotesque and exaggerated images does not lessen the gravity of the threat,” they write. “The threat in this case was not merely a few words shouted during a brawl; it was a series of grammatically correct sentences composed at a computer keyboard over a period of at least several minutes.”

An attorney for the defendants said he would appeal the decision to the state’s supreme court.

Photo: Extraketchup/Flickr

LulzSec & Anonymous Declare War Against Government! Operation Anti-Security ‘#AntiSec’! Leak Info! – YouTube

and i seem to be there favorite target! FUCK YOU, ASSHOLES